A downside of S3 Browser is that it doesn't support synchronization.Ĭloudberry S3 does support synchronization and it even works (contrary to S3Fox). S3Fox also allows you to store your credentials, but it doesn't offer password protection. Since Amazon's Secret Access Key is much too long for a password, it has to be stored in the S3 Browser. What I like about the S3 Browser that you can secure your Amazon credentials (Access Key ID and Secret Access Key) with a password. Whenever you want to download or upload files, you always have to browse to the local folder. The tool only displays the contents of the S3 buckets. S3 Browser is the only tool I tried that doesn't divide the screen into two panes.
Open amazon s3 browser pro#
Check out this comparison table for information about the differences between the free and the pro version. The main downside of the free version is that it is only for private use.
Open amazon s3 browser portable#
There is a free and a pro version of S3 Browser (29.95 USD, 39.95 for the portable version). Sometimes the upload or download was stuck in the queue sometimes S3Fox uploaded a file even though it was unchanged. However, in my test, this didn't work reliably. S3Fox also allows you to synchronize local and remote folders. You can create S3 buckets (folders with a unique name), upload, download, share folders, edit the Access Control List (ACL), and retrieve the bucket URL. The tool has all of the essential features. On the left hand side, you have your local file system and on the right hand side, the remote S3 storage. Like most S3 file managers, S3Fox divides the screen into halves. Even though S3Fox runs in a web browser, the application's look and feel is almost like native Windows application. Thus, if you don't use Firefox, this tool probably is not an option for you. As far as I know, there is no version for any other web browser.
0 kommentar(er)
